How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 20:15 UTC·Repo last pushed 190 days ago — may be stale
Rank Trend
2026-06-012026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
1.5k
Forks
241
Last Push
2025-11-26
190 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
95
Rank Change
▼7
was #174
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
37.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
7.3 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
11.8 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
0.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
7.6 / 20
Activity Inputs
30.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
19.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.1 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.9 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
49%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection6
CI-Tests6
CII-Best-Practices0
Code-Review10
Contributors10
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool0
Fuzzing0
License10
Maintained0
Packaging-1
Pinned-Dependencies0
SAST0
Security-Policy0
Signed-Releases-1
Token-Permissions0
Vulnerabilities0
Is Webarena safe?
Public trust evidence for Webarena is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Webarena publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Webarena. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Webarena have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Webarena has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Webarena actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 190 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Webarena use?
Webarena ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Webarena's commits signed?
49% of the last 100 commits to Webarena are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Webarena?
HVTrust scores Webarena from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OSSF Scorecard via deps.dev
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.1 · Raw JSON
