How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 20:15 UTC·Repo last pushed 54 days ago
Rank Trend
2026-05-252026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
6.6k
Forks
957
Last Push
2026-04-11
54 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
37
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
7
Rank Change
▼6
was #144
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
47.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
6.4 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
11.0 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
8.4 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
11.3 / 20
Activity Inputs
54.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
22.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
17.5 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.9 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.9 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
55%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection3
CI-Tests2
CII-Best-Practices0
Code-Review2
Contributors6
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool0
Fuzzing0
License10
Maintained4
Packaging-1
Pinned-Dependencies0
SAST0
Security-Policy0
Signed-Releases0
Token-Permissions0
Vulnerabilities0
Is Superagent safe?
Public trust evidence for Superagent is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Superagent publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Superagent. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Superagent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Superagent has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Superagent actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 54 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Superagent use?
Superagent ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Superagent's commits signed?
55% of the last 100 commits to Superagent are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Superagent?
HVTrust scores Superagent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
