How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 18:04 UTC·Repo last pushed today
Rank Trend
2026-05-252026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
21.8k
Forks
2.0k
Last Push
2026-06-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
390
Downloads (7d)
2,202
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
2
Open Issues
169
Rank Change
▼1
was #18
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
88.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
21.2 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
18.0 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
14.4 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
20.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
14.9 / 20
Activity Inputs
91.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.4 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.0 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection8
CI-Tests10
CII-Best-Practices0
Code-Review0
Contributors10
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool10
Fuzzing10
License10
Maintained10
Packaging10
Pinned-Dependencies4
SAST10
Security-Policy10
Signed-Releases-1
Token-Permissions0
Vulnerabilities0
Is Skyvern safe?
Public supply-chain signals for Skyvern are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Skyvern carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Skyvern publish package provenance?
Yes. Skyvern's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Skyvern have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Skyvern has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Skyvern actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Skyvern use?
Skyvern ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Skyvern's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Skyvern are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Skyvern?
HVTrust scores Skyvern from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
