How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 18:04 UTC·Repo last pushed 244 days ago — may be stale
Rank Trend
2026-05-242026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
15.4k
Forks
1.1k
Last Push
2025-10-03
244 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
54
Rank Change
▼10
was #194
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
23.6 / 100 · 67.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
3.6 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
10.9 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
0.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
10.1 / 20
Activity Inputs
39.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.2 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.8 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
3%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection3
CI-Tests-1
CII-Best-Practices0
Code-Review0
Contributors6
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool0
Fuzzing0
License10
Maintained0
Packaging10
Pinned-Dependencies0
SAST0
Security-Policy0
Signed-Releases0
Token-Permissions0
Vulnerabilities0
Is Plandex safe?
Public trust evidence for Plandex is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Plandex publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Plandex. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Plandex have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Plandex has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Plandex actively maintained?
Stale. The repository has not been pushed to in 244 days. Consider whether the project is still being maintained.
What license does Plandex use?
Plandex ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Plandex's commits signed?
3% of the last 100 commits to Plandex are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Plandex?
HVTrust scores Plandex from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
