How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 20:15 UTC·Repo last pushed today
Rank Trend
2026-05-252026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
49.9k
Forks
7.5k
Last Push
2026-06-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
58
Downloads (7d)
2,758,520
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
1
Open Issues
421
Rank Change
▼7
was #146
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
47.5 / 100 · 75.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
5.0 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
19.1 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
19.9 / 20
Activity Inputs
93.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
28.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
22.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
18.0 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Is LlamaIndex safe?
Public trust evidence for LlamaIndex is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does LlamaIndex publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for LlamaIndex. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does LlamaIndex have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for LlamaIndex. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is LlamaIndex actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does LlamaIndex use?
LlamaIndex ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are LlamaIndex's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to LlamaIndex are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
Runtime trust — coming soon
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain LlamaIndex?
HVTrust scores LlamaIndex from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
