How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-04 20:15 UTC·Repo last pushed today
Rank Trend
2026-05-252026-06-04
Activity & Reach
Stars
8.0k
Forks
990
Last Push
2026-06-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
70
Downloads (7d)
18,434
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
319
Rank Change
▼3
was #71
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
68.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
10.5 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
12.9 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
19.4 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
15.1 / 20
Activity Inputs
85.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
23.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.9 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.2 / 10
via deps.dev · OpenSSF
Signed Commits
79%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts10
Branch-Protection3
CI-Tests9
CII-Best-Practices0
Code-Review6
Contributors10
Dangerous-Workflow10
Dependency-Update-Tool0
Fuzzing0
License10
Maintained10
Packaging-1
Pinned-Dependencies0
SAST0
Security-Policy10
Signed-Releases-1
Token-Permissions0
Vulnerabilities5
Is Garak safe?
Garak has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Garak publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Garak. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Garak have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Garak has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Garak actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Garak use?
Garak ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Garak's commits signed?
79% of the last 100 commits to Garak are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
HVTrust currently scores supply-chain signals. We're adding runtime trust next: what an agent actually does when it runs — what it can reach, which tools it carries, what external services it depends on. Track progress on the roadmap →
MCP support
Tool / plugin surface
External service deps
Package provenance drift
Maintain Garak?
HVTrust scores Garak from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
